Agentic reporting and evidence
Agentic reports translate live governance and runtime records for different decision makers. Select the output whose purpose matches the audience; do not use one report as a substitute for all assurance work.
| Output | Primary use |
|---|---|
| Evidence Pack | Trace controls, policies, approvals, tests and runtime evidence. |
| Agentic Board Report | Summarise exposure, incidents, readiness and decisions for leadership. |
| Security Architecture Report | Explain identities, trust boundaries, connections, data movement and enforcement. |
| Red Team Report | Record authorised scope, scenarios, results, limitations and remediation. |
| Control Tower Report | Summarise per-agent ATF posture, gates, exceptions and trends. |
| Framework Mapping | Trace agentic controls to supporting framework requirements without claiming equivalence. |
Generation checklist
Section titled “Generation checklist”- Confirm workspace, systems, agents, period and intended audience.
- Check that the underlying records and evidence are current.
- Resolve unexplained scope, policy and incident contradictions.
- Include open limitations, accepted risks and overdue work.
- Generate and record the run metadata.
- Review content and redact unnecessary sensitive operational detail before distribution.
- Regenerate after material changes rather than editing an old export into a new conclusion.
Interpretation
Section titled “Interpretation”Counts and maturity summaries support prioritisation but do not demonstrate that a specific action was authorised. Use request-bound Gateway evidence for runtime decisions. Framework mappings show support and reuse opportunities; they do not create compliance inheritance.