Who Gamut is for
Gamut is built for two audiences that have to trust the same records: the organisation running AI governance and the auditor reviewing it. The platform is designed so that both work from one source of truth.
For organisations running AI governance
Section titled “For organisations running AI governance”Gamut gives AI governance, risk, compliance, security, procurement and business teams a shared operating layer for responsible AI adoption.
- One place to see AI systems, owners, risks and evidence.
- A practical route from AI literacy to board reporting.
- A governance lifecycle that supports EU AI Act readiness and wider assurance needs.
- Clear outputs for leadership, risk, compliance, security and procurement teams.
Roles that use Gamut
Section titled “Roles that use Gamut”| Role | What they get from Gamut |
|---|---|
| Chief Risk / Compliance Officer | A defensible view of AI risk across the organisation and board-ready reporting. |
| AI governance / responsible AI lead | A repeatable operating model across the lifecycle and across frameworks. |
| CISO / security | Control expectations, evidence and the agentic stack for AI that takes action. |
| Procurement / vendor risk | Structured assessment of vendor and third-party AI before and during use. |
| System / model owners | A clear record of their AI system, its risk tier and the controls expected of it. |
For auditors reviewing AI governance
Section titled “For auditors reviewing AI governance”Gamut helps auditors and reviewers assess governance activity through structured records, evidence quality, findings and remediation history.
- Structured evidence instead of scattered files and informal explanations.
- Traceability from AI system record to risk decision, control expectation, evidence and finding.
- Consistent review packs for internal audit, client assurance and external review.
- Clearer follow-up on findings, exceptions, remediation and residual risk.
Where Gamut fits
Section titled “Where Gamut fits”Gamut is most valuable when AI adoption has outgrown informal tracking but governance still has to satisfy external scrutiny, buyers running vendor due diligence, boards asking for assurance, internal audit testing controls, and regulators assessing readiness against the EU AI Act and equivalent regimes.