Skip to content

Framework currency and versioning

Every defensible assessment identifies the framework or legal snapshot used. A later publication, law, guidance document or product methodology must not silently rewrite an earlier conclusion.

  • Framework and methodology name and version.
  • Legal “as of” date where applicable.
  • System and model version.
  • Assessment and evidence cutoff dates.
  • Assessor and reviewer.
  • Pending changes and next review trigger.

Use authoritative primary sources: enacted law and official journals for legal obligations; publisher or canonical repository for frameworks; a licensed copy for ISO standards. Secondary summaries can help navigation but should not replace the source relied upon.

ModuleBasis represented in these guidesCurrency treatment
GTSAFGamut’s 358-control trust, security and assurance frameworkRecord the Gamut catalogue/version used.
ACRSFour-dimension capability-risk methodRecord the calculation and routing-method version.
MAESTROCSA agentic AI threat-modelling frameworkRecheck the CSA publication when its catalogue changes.
ATFSpecification 0.9.1 and Conformance 0.9.0, Public Review DraftShow draft status and exact version in conclusions.
NIST AI RMFNIST AI RMF 1.0 and applicable ProfilesIdentify the RMF and Profile publication used.
EU AI ActRegulation (EU) 2024/1689 and the module’s stated legal snapshotCheck the Official Journal and adopted amendments before live legal conclusions.
NAGFConsolidated Nigerian current-law, sector, policy and readiness modelVerify every relied-upon official source at the evidence cutoff.
ISO/IEC 42001ISO/IEC 42001:2023Use a licensed copy and record edition.
ISO/IEC 42005ISO/IEC 42005:2025Use a licensed copy and record edition.

The public documentation was rechecked on 21 July 2026 against the Official Journal text of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, current European Commission implementation material, the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 and official Nigerian AI strategy material published by NCAIR/NITDA. The EU module retains its displayed EUAIA-2026-07-16-defensible-system-scope identifier so the guide matches the implemented assessment. Political agreement, proposed amendments and draft guidance are not silently treated as enacted law.

This check is not legal advice and does not replace verification at the assessment date.

When a source changes, determine whether it affects wording, applicability, scoring, evidence or the conclusion. Update methodology identifier and catalogue together where required. Keep the earlier assessment reproducible, mark affected systems for reassessment and record the change basis.