Per-agent assessment workflow
1. Select the registered agent
Section titled “1. Select the registered agent”Confirm the agent name, identifier, owner, purpose, version, environment, tools and current authority. The assessment is cleared or changed when another agent is selected.
2. Confirm agentic scope
Section titled “2. Confirm agentic scope”Document:
- Trigger and intended outcome.
- Inputs, memory and retrieval.
- Models and dependent agents.
- Tools, APIs and reachable systems.
- Read, write, execute and administrative capability.
- Human approvals and escalation.
- Users and affected people.
- Data sensitivity and jurisdictions.
- Maximum single and cumulative impact.
- Failure, misuse and incident scenarios.
3. Set current and target levels
Section titled “3. Set current and target levels”Record the presently approved operating level and the proposed target. If the current authority does not match the documented level, raise a finding immediately.
4. Work through all five elements
Section titled “4. Work through all five elements”Assess every canonical requirement. The target-level matrix tells you whether the requirement is a MUST, SHOULD or MAY, but it does not replace contextual judgement.
5. Record the result and depth
Section titled “5. Record the result and depth”For each requirement, choose:
- Fully met
- Partially met
- Not addressed
Then record depth:
| Result | Depth labels |
|---|---|
| Fully met | 1 Ad hoc, 2 Defined, 3 Embedded |
| Partially met or Not addressed | 1 Not started, 2 In progress, 3 Near complete |
Partially met and Near complete remain blockers for a target-level MUST. Use the normative level matrix and documented exception governance for SHOULD or MAY treatment.
6. Read the requirement advisory
Section titled “6. Read the requirement advisory”Use the on-screen playbook to:
- Understand the control objective.
- Identify minimum, production and advanced practices.
- Ask agent-specific questions.
- Inspect suitable evidence.
- Design a safe test.
- Recognise common false assurance.
Technology examples are options, not mandatory products.
7. Link objective evidence
Section titled “7. Link objective evidence”Prefer evidence that proves both design and operation: identity records, policy decisions, traces, denials, approvals, monitoring, incident exercises and configuration-change records.
8. Test enforcement
Section titled “8. Test enforcement”Test the negative path. Attempt an unauthorised resource, action, volume or transaction within an approved non-destructive environment and verify that enforcement, logging and response all occur.
9. Record findings and incidents
Section titled “9. Record findings and incidents”Reflect failed tests, stale evidence, operating exceptions and incident history in the requirement result. Do not retain a favourable result that is contradicted by current adverse evidence.
10. Complete promotion gates
Section titled “10. Complete promotion gates”For promotion, work through Performance, Security Validation, Business Value, Incident Record and Governance Sign-off. Attach evidence to each gate rather than relying on a single approval statement.
11. Decide
Section titled “11. Decide”Record:
- Maintain current level.
- Hold promotion.
- Approve promotion.
- Demote.
- Suspend or contain pending investigation.
Include decision owner, conditions, residual risk and next review.
12. Maintain
Section titled “12. Maintain”Reassess after material change, incident, drift, failed test, new tool or privilege, changed purpose, new affected population, or expiry of evidence.
Completion checklist
Section titled “Completion checklist”- Correct registered agent selected.
- Identity and capability manifest are current.
- Current authority matches current ATF level.
- All 25 requirements considered.
- Requirement result and depth labels are consistent.
- MUST requirements supported for the target.
- SHOULD exceptions are justified.
- Evidence is agent-, version- and environment-specific.
- Boundaries and containment have been tested.
- Incidents and adverse findings are reflected.
- All applicable promotion gates are complete.
- Human decision, conditions and reassessment triggers are recorded.